Results

The tables below present results for the Single Device Track and the Multiple Device Track. For each track, results are presented in two sets of tables: Ranking A - where teams are not allowed to modify the baseline LM; Ranking B - where the LM is unconstrained. Ranking B also includes end-to-end systems without a separate explicit LM.

Note, the official Baseline is a Single Device Ranking A system but its scores are repeated in all tables for the sake of comparison.

Single Device Track, Ranking A (constrained LM)

Rank	Team	Paper	Dev	Eval
	USTC-iFlytek	[paper]	50.64	46.42
	Hitachi-JHU	[paper]	56.40	50.36
	STC	[paper]	56.62	55.52
	Toshiba	[paper]	60.75	56.54
	NWPU	[paper]	65.16	57.85
	ASUS	[paper]	70.02	61.31
	CAS	[paper]	71.77	62.01
	RWTH-Paderborn	[paper]	63.76	62.72
	SHNU	[paper]	64.44	64.45
	IISC	[paper]	73.37	66.11
	Sheffield-Oldenburg	[paper]	74.78	66.72
	NDSC	[paper]	75.12	67.31
	Paderborn	[paper]	71.43	69.60
	Baseline	[paper]	81.14	73.27
	Lenovo	[paper]	90.52	84.81
	IIT Bombay-TCS	[paper]	95.56	97.36
	TCS-IIT Bombay	[paper]	95.52	104.67

[TOP]

Single Device Track, Ranking B (unconstrained LM)

Rank	Team	Paper	Dev	Eval
	USTC-iFlytek	[paper]	50.20	46.11
	Hitachi-JHU	[paper]	55.15	48.20
	NWPU	[paper]	63.53	56.09
	CAS	[paper]	71.15	61.33
	NWPU-Mobvoi	[paper]	69.57	68.71
	CMU	[paper]	82.08	71.82
	Baseline	[paper]	81.14	73.27
	AnTech	[paper]	78.28	73.50

[TOP]

Multiple Device Track, Ranking A (constrained LM)

Rank	Team	Paper	Dev	Eval
	USTC-iFlytek	[paper]	45.65	46.63
	Hitachi-JHU	[paper]	54.00	50.59
	RWTH-Paderborn	[paper]	54.56	55.26
	STC	[paper]	53.49	55.59
	CAS	[paper]	71.95	61.77
	Sheffield-Oldenburg	[paper]	72.37	67.22
	Paderborn	[paper]	61.73	68.98
	Baseline	[paper]	81.14	73.27
	Lenovo	[paper]	91.00	85.01

[TOP]

Multiple Device Track, Ranking B (unconstrained LM)

Rank	Team	Paper	Dev	Eval
	USTC-iFlytek	[paper]	45.05	46.14
	Hitachi-JHU	[paper]	52.38	48.24
	CAS	[paper]	71.02	61.01
	Baseline	[paper]	81.14	73.27
	DAIICT-IIITV	[paper]	81.42	76.42

[TOP]